What is a Larke v Nugus Statement?

Cases involving disputed wills very often feature a Larke v Nugus statement. 

A Larke v Nugus statement is  prepared by the Solicitor who originally prepared the disputed will or witnessed its execution. These statements are frequently requested by the Claimant’s solicitor as evidence against the validity of a will on the grounds of lack of testamentary capacity, undue influence, want of knowledge or approval or forgery.

The name, Lark v Nugus, originates from a  legal case that determined the law on requests for information regarding the circumstances surrounding the instruction and execution of a will [Larke v Nugus [2000] WTLR 1033].

The starting position in relation to disclosure of information regarding a deceased's will is that the information should only be made available to the personal representatives of the estate (or to others with their consent) prior to obtaining the Grant of Administration. However, this does not apply where a request for information is made to the Solicitor who prepared and/or witnessed the execution of the will and there is a dispute in relation to that will. In these circumstances the Law Society has recommended, since 1959, that the Solicitor should make a statement outlining the circumstances surrounding the instruction and execution of the will to any party to probate proceedings or someone who has a reasonable claim against the will. In 2000 the case of Larke v Nugus endorsed this long standing recommendation, which means that a request for information now carries judicial weight.

A request for a Larke v Nugus statement may seek some or all of the following information and documentation:

  • How long the Solicitor had known the deceased.
  • Who introduced the Solicitor to the deceased.
  • The date the Solicitor received instructions from the deceased.
  • Contemporaneous notes of all meetings and telephone calls, including confirmation of where the meeting took place and who else was present at the meeting.
  • How the instructions were expressed.
  • What indication the deceased gave that they knew they were making a will.
  • Whether the deceased exhibited any signs of confusion, loss of memory or ill health.
  • Whether and to what extent earlier wills were discussed and what attempts were made to discuss departures from the deceased's earlier will-making pattern; what reasons the testator gave for making any such departures.
  • How the provisions of the will were explained to the deceased
  • Who, apart from the attesting witnesses, were present at the execution of the will and where, when and how this took place.

Where we are instructed to challenge the validity of a will drawn up and/or witnessed by a Solicitor we will ask the Solicitor's firm to provide us with a copy of their file accompanying the will instruction, together with a Larke v Nugus statement dealing with all the issues raised above. This will often be very helpful in determining the strength of a validity claim. It will often indicate whether the deceased was advised correctly by the Solicitor, whether there were individuals present at instruction/execution to support allegations of undue influence and whether the Solicitor undertook the correct test for testamentary capacity.

If you wish to contest the validity of a will on the grounds of lack of testamentary capacity, undue influence, want of knowledge or approval or forgery then contact us on 0808 139 1599 for a free case assessment.